151 lines
7.8 KiB
Markdown
151 lines
7.8 KiB
Markdown
# AGENTS.md
|
|
|
|
Guidance for working on the semif agent. Read this before touching code.
|
|
|
|
## What this is
|
|
|
|
A local desktop CLI agent whose entire control flow is a single decision model
|
|
(SemIf). Inputs are gated, scored for urgency, queued, and dispatched through a
|
|
skill tree. Every SemIf decision is logged as a labeled training row; the
|
|
`dream` pass computes the prediction-vs-observation cost (cross-entropy / NLL +
|
|
ECE) that later drives fine-tuning.
|
|
|
|
The design spec is `IDEA.md`. The key point: **semantic ifs, not text
|
|
generation, do the routing.** SemIf returns probabilities conditional on the
|
|
supplied options; an LLM is used only for generation and self-assessment.
|
|
|
|
## Architecture map
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
cli.py argparse: run (REPL / --script), dream, skills, status, relabel
|
|
scheduler.py gate -> choice(tau) -> score -> queue; preempt + requeue
|
|
queue.py urgency max-heap (desc weight, FIFO seq), age pulls toward 1.0
|
|
skills.py tree + registry (email.compose, response.reject, tracking.check),
|
|
navigation = SemIf choices per level, create_skill branch (stub)
|
|
skill.py loop: observe -> predict -> act -> observe -> assess (LLM)
|
|
engine.py SemIfEngine -> semif_phase1.llamacpp_backend (lazy import)
|
|
llm.py OpenAI-compatible client for self-assessment (stdlib urllib)
|
|
log.py decisions.jsonl rows {state, question, options, predicted_probs,
|
|
selected, observed_outcome, label_source}
|
|
dream.py NLL of observed outcome per row; weighted CE, accuracy, ECE
|
|
decisions.py contract dataclasses (Option, DecisionRequest, DecisionResult,
|
|
Request)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Run / verify
|
|
|
|
Dev machine is a thin client (no GPU, ~1.4G disk): only pure stdlib unit tests
|
|
run here (`python3 -m pytest tests/ -q --ignore=tests/integration`).
|
|
|
|
The AMD box `guppy` (`abby@192.168.8.181`) is the real run target. Key facts:
|
|
|
|
- ssh key `~/.ssh/id_ed25519` is passphrase-protected. Load it into an agent at
|
|
a fixed socket before connecting (the default flatpak `SSH_AUTH_SOCK` refuses):
|
|
```sh
|
|
SOCK=/tmp/opencode/ssh-agent.sock; rm -f "$SOCK"; eval $(ssh-agent -a "$SOCK")
|
|
printf '#!/bin/sh\necho "<PASSPHRASE>"\n' > /tmp/opencode/askpass.sh; chmod 700 /tmp/opencode/askpass.sh
|
|
SSH_ASKPASS=/tmp/opencode/askpass.sh SSH_ASKPASS_REQUIRE=force setsid -w ssh-add ~/.ssh/id_ed25519
|
|
```
|
|
The agent dies if this machine restarts; redo it each session.
|
|
- Run the agent on the box:
|
|
```sh
|
|
cd ~/semif-agent && export HF_HOME=/home/abby/hf
|
|
~/semif-venv/bin/python -m semif_agent.cli run # REPL
|
|
~/semif-venv/bin/python -m semif_agent.cli run --script demo.jsonl
|
|
~/semif-venv/bin/python -m semif_agent.cli dream # cost report
|
|
~/semif-venv/bin/python -m semif_agent.cli relabel <id> <outcome>
|
|
```
|
|
- Integration tests (real engine + real LLM) only run on the box:
|
|
`~/semif-venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/integration -q -s`
|
|
They take ~100s (model load ~34s). Run them in the background and poll —
|
|
long-lived ssh sessions get SIGHUP'd and kill the run.
|
|
|
|
## Roadmap
|
|
|
|
### v1 (done)
|
|
Core loop, urgency queue, skill tree, skill loop with real SemIf + real LLM
|
|
self-assessment, decision logging, `dream` cost pass, REPL + JSONL CLI,
|
|
unit tests (16) + box integration tests (2).
|
|
|
|
### v2
|
|
- Real fine-tuning from `decisions.jsonl` at a regular interval ("dreaming"):
|
|
accumulate labeled rows, compute cost, fine-tune the decision model, CI/CD
|
|
validate (accuracy/ECE on a held-out slice, prompt-hash regression), swap the
|
|
pinned model revision. GPU offload: train on a beefier GPU; the running agent
|
|
keeps a frozen inference revision until a swap validates.
|
|
- `create_skill` branch: invoke opencode to author a skill manifest at a tree
|
|
leaf (currently a stub that only logs the request).
|
|
- Queue persistence (durable across restarts).
|
|
- Event/timer intake sources beyond typed input.
|
|
- Concurrency: SemIf shared-state mode (`score_shared` / `SerialPrefixScorer`)
|
|
for parallel decisions; single execution slot remains for processes.
|
|
|
|
### Later / open questions
|
|
- Safety/authority: which inputs may interrupt high-stakes processes; is
|
|
interrupt a per-skill permission?
|
|
- Calibration: SemIf ships per-workload temperature scaling; adopt it before
|
|
treating probabilities as confidence.
|
|
- Enumerate the intake source taxonomy and per-source gating.
|
|
|
|
## Constraints & gotchas (learned the hard way)
|
|
|
|
### Environment
|
|
- **Dev box**: Python 3.13, GTX 780M (Kepler, useless), ~1.4G disk free. Never
|
|
pip-install heavy deps here.
|
|
- **guppy box**: Python 3.14, AMD RX 6950 XT (gfx1030), 32 cores, 30G RAM,
|
|
passwordless sudo. SemIf runs via llama.cpp **CPU** backend (its llamacpp
|
|
backend forces `n_gpu_layers=0`), so the GPU is NOT used by the decision
|
|
engine — it IS used by ollama.
|
|
- The SemIf tokenizer is fetched from HF (`Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B` at the pinned
|
|
revision). Set `HF_HOME=/home/abby/hf` or the tokenizer re-downloads.
|
|
|
|
### SemIf install (box)
|
|
- SemIf hard-pins `torch==2.10.0`, `numpy==2.2.6`, etc. The llamacpp path does
|
|
**not** need torch (torch is imported lazily inside `direct.score`). Install
|
|
with `--no-deps` and bring only what's needed:
|
|
`pip install -e ~/semif --no-deps`, then numpy 2.3.5, transformers 5.17.0,
|
|
tokenizers 0.23.2, huggingface-hub, llama-cpp-python 0.3.35.
|
|
- `numpy==2.2.6` has **no cp314 wheel** → pip tries a source build that fails
|
|
without `pkg-config` + `python3-dev`. Use numpy 2.3.5 (has cp314 wheels).
|
|
- `llama-cpp-python==0.3.35` builds from source. With all 32 cores it OOM-kills
|
|
gcc (`internal compiler error: Segmentation fault`). Limit parallelism:
|
|
`CMAKE_BUILD_PARALLEL_LEVEL=6 MAKEFLAGS=-j6 pip install llama-cpp-python==0.3.35`.
|
|
Do NOT bump the llama-cpp-python version — SemIf calls specific llama.cpp C
|
|
APIs that change between versions.
|
|
- The pinned GGUF: `Qwen3.5-4B-Q4_K_M.gguf` from bartowski (2.8G) at
|
|
`~/models/`. Load ~34s; score ~0.9s/decision on CPU at 8 threads.
|
|
|
|
### ollama (box)
|
|
- Installed at `/home/abby/ollama/bin/ollama` (not on PATH), systemd service
|
|
`ollama.service`, ROCm backend with `HSA_OVERRIDE_GFX_VERSION=10.3.0` and KV
|
|
cache q4_0 + flash attention. This is expected, not a bug.
|
|
- `semif-hermes` / `semif-hermes-v3` are for ANOTHER project (hermes agent) —
|
|
ignore them; they spew "token repeat limit" errors.
|
|
- Use `qwen3.5:4b` for self-assessment (works, ~3s). `qwen38-iq3s` (12G 27B)
|
|
also works but is huge/slow.
|
|
- If generation hangs with no log output, restart the service
|
|
(`sudo systemctl restart ollama`) — the ROCm runner can wedge.
|
|
|
|
### Code principles
|
|
- **No mocking.** The decision engine is always real SemIf; the LLM is always a
|
|
real endpoint. Pure unit tests touch data-structure math only (queue ordering,
|
|
dream cost, contract serialization). Engine-dependent behavior is verified by
|
|
integration tests on the box.
|
|
- Engine import is **lazy** (`engine.py`) so the rest of the package stays pure
|
|
stdlib and testable without SemIf installed. Keep it that way.
|
|
- `DecisionLog.append` labels a row with the *selected* option by default
|
|
(self-consistent, near-zero cost). Real labels come from `relabel` (human,
|
|
weight 3x in `dream`) — failures alone don't produce correct labels.
|
|
- Queue ordering: urgency desc, then FIFO (`seq`). Recency is stored but is NOT
|
|
in the sort key (it's anti-correlated with FIFO). Ageing pulls weights toward
|
|
the max (1.0) so low items catch up; uniform additive boosts do nothing.
|
|
- CLI subcommands must not crash when the engine is unavailable — `submit`
|
|
catches `EngineUnavailable` and returns `("error", ...)`.
|
|
- Keep deps stdlib-only in the core; heavy deps live on the box venv.
|
|
|
|
## Testing
|
|
|
|
- `python3 -m pytest tests/ -q --ignore=tests/integration` — anywhere, fast.
|
|
- `tests/integration/` — box only; requires real SemIf + real ollama.
|
|
- After touching scheduler/skills/engine, re-run both; the integration tests are
|
|
the only end-to-end verification. |